<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blonde 2.0 Blog - Latest Comments in The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement</title><link>http://blonde20blog.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://blonde20blog.disqus.com/the_brilliance_of_twitter_lists_and_suggestions_for_improvement/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:12:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement</title><link>http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2009/11/01/the-brilliance-of-twitter-lists-and-suggestions-for-improvement/#comment-22464520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure that I can follow more people now with lists because I don't have to read all of twits of all the people all the time: I just go to the list that attract me at that moment and that's all. Will it generates more traffic on both sides? I'm not that sure, it can bee a one way ticket affair very easily... and maybe my twitter use is still not my main point of interest, I still count the people... but I think Alphonse is right, the noise will make the shift, not the real use. Like the Wave.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tzvi Katzburg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement</title><link>http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2009/11/01/the-brilliance-of-twitter-lists-and-suggestions-for-improvement/#comment-21716940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ayelet - I have your solution to #5, for starters. Check out the functionality of the &lt;a href="http://Lunch.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Lunch.com"&gt;Lunch.com&lt;/a&gt; TwitterLists &lt;a href="http://www.lunch.com/TwitterEditList" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.lunch.com/TwitterEditList"&gt;http://www.lunch.com/Twitte...&lt;/a&gt;. With Lunch you have the ability to describe why you recommend each pick, tweet your list to your followers and @reply to the people on your list. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aunny</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement</title><link>http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2009/11/01/the-brilliance-of-twitter-lists-and-suggestions-for-improvement/#comment-21711537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The silver lining: "helping twitter organize its database for them"&lt;br&gt;twitter is swarm with chaos in almost every bit of data. it's time for the masses to organize their sh*t for them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ilan peer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:18:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement</title><link>http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2009/11/01/the-brilliance-of-twitter-lists-and-suggestions-for-improvement/#comment-21688254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. The focus will shift from how many list you are on because there is too many noise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Being on a list ensure that you are actually more "listened".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interactivity is important as well but in terms of using Twitter for brands, reach is more important than interactivity. That's the ugly truth. Brands want the target market to interact with them more than they want to interact with their consumers/clients.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alphonse Hà</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>