<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blonde 2.0 Blog - Latest Comments in Finding the Meaning to Meaningo&amp;#8217;s Search Engine</title><link>http://blonde20blog.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://blonde20blog.disqus.com/finding_the_meaning_to_meaningo8217s_search_engine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:24:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Finding the Meaning to Meaningo&amp;#8217;s Search Engine</title><link>http://www.blonde2dot0.com/blog/2009/10/12/finding-the-meaning-to-meaningos-search-engine/#comment-20102650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on the information in the blog it sounds as if meaningo is going to implement the newer created SEO in online marketing to optimize search results. As a laison between the two I can envision Blonde20's interest. But my question is: what is stopping other companies ( google) from implementing like processes to optimize search results. It seems to me that would be a great corporate strategy in maintaining user support. I can't imagine a future of people meaningo-ing. It's just too hard to say.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doingit1981</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>